3 post-COVID-19 fintech trends you should know about

Iwo Hachulski

29 Jun 2020
3 post-COVID-19 fintech trends you should know about

It is no doubt that fintech has been gradually implementing successive stages of the revolution in the banking services sector. The main beneficiaries of this state of affairs are, apart from fintech itself, consumers. Traditional banking adopts various strategies regarding the existing status quo, some banks, including Santander, are constantly investing heavily in the most promising fintech startups in order to then implement their solutions for their customers. Others - try to create their own unique products, which are then implemented by other players in the market. One of the best examples here is Bank PKO BP and the contactless payment system BLIK developed by the bank's IT department. The constantly ongoing time of the epidemic has changed many behaviors and habits. What mark has COVID-19 left on the modern financial services sector, a popular fintech? What prospects should we expect from a full opening of economies in a global context?

Extraordinary times require extraordinary solutions

Revaluation of priorities - this is probably the simplest and most rational way to describe the changes introduced by the coronavirus in our lives. Sanitary restrictions have forced the financial sector, like many others, to a new opening - and a look into the future from a completely different perspective. The need for full mobility introduced along with the full compatibility of the solutions used became, within a few weeks, a determinant of the effectiveness of the adaptation of both traditional banking and the fintech giants. 

However, it would be unfair to put them next to each other in this context - mainly due to the fact that it was not so much an unimaginable challenge for fintech to move almost 100 percent of their business into the digital world. This state of affairs is primarily due to the fact that the vast majority (and very often 100%) of fintech services offered within the framework of retail banking, for example, are available only online. The vast majority of them have decided on such a business model from the very beginning - on the one hand, they have focused on reducing the costs of running branches together with minimizing fixed costs and, as a result, full mobility, and on the other hand, they have often closed themselves off to clients currently almost exclusively connected with traditional banking. However, such a strategy has brought the expected results. Fintechs, although also often forced to make cuts - among others, Revolut announced the introduction of restrictions in the cheapest plan offered to customers and numerous layoffs in the Polish branch of the company - usually did not have to face the complicated task of transferring several thousand employees into remote operation almost overnight. Thus, they were able to focus on introducing specific solutions offered to their clients instead of dealing with their internal problems in the first place. For example, Starling Bank launched the "combined card" function, which enables the transfer of a second, "back-up" debit card linked to the customer's account to someone who can spend on their behalf. A team of developers from Fronted, Credit Kudos and 11:FS created Covid Credit for the self-employed, allowing access to financial aid for the most vulnerable people who are not covered by government support. A significant role is also slowly being played by fintech software houses, which offer IT services using the latest Fintech solutions such as Blockchain or AI.

Mobility and security above all

Due to health restrictions and recommendations, the volume of both card and phone payments increased slightly, for instance, in India it was about 5%. According to many experts in banking and social psychology, such a trend may last longer. According to the Mordor Intelligence report "Mobile Payments Market - Growth, Trends, and Forecast" (2020-2025) The use of m-payments will continue to grow strongly with an annual cumulative growth rate of as much as 26.93%. In Central Europe, this is mainly due to the still very young banking system, often developed from scratch only in the 1990s. For this reason, many behaviors are not so deeply rooted in society, which is thus much more susceptible to all kinds of innovation.

Another element that is hard not to mention is budgeting apps, i.e. applications for planning and controlling the budget. Although their popularity in Poland and other Central European countries is not as impressive as in the United States, this may gradually change due to the inevitable economic crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic. Full control over one's own budget due to the difficult social and economic situation will undoubtedly become one of the priorities - thus bringing the possibility of a structured review of one's own spending to the fore. The applications differ in many ways, so that everyone can find something for themselves. Mint automatically categorizes transactions from credit and debit cards connected to the system and tracks them against a budget that can be adjusted and adapted to user's needs. Goodbudget, on the other hand, is mainly dedicated to couples - it is possible to share and fully synchronize the budget with another person in both iOS and Android.

Tandem and natural competition

Despite all the turmoil, the post-pandemic outlook for the coming months seems stable, although not as promising as previously expected. According to Ron Shevlin, Managing Director of Fintech Research at Cornerstone Advisors, the era of fintech experimentation is slowly coming to an end. The indicators that will gain in importance are primarily the number of accounts funded and their percentage in relation to the total number of application downloads. In his opinion, in the case of mainly B2B-oriented fintechs, the crucial benchmarks will be more operational, such as improved speed, cycle time and lower costs.

Moreover, there is a large disparity within the banking sector environment itself. There is continued optimism among the largest fintechs. By February 2020, Revolut already had less than 11 million users. According to the owners' forecasts, the number of users is expected to reach 13.07 million by the end of June, and then increase by about 20%, to reach 16.45 million by December 2020. The second largest player, N26, has already exceeded 5 million users in January, thus maintaining almost exponential growth and significantly exceeding the company's forecasts.

The situation is different for traditional banks, whose financial situation has often deteriorated. According to analyses of the International Monetary Fund, in addition to the immediate challenges posed by the COVID-19 outbreak, the relentless period of low interest rates may put further pressure on bank profitability in the forthcoming years. This may be a cause for concern, mainly due to the fact that it is the constant development of both traditional and modern banking that may be the key to recover from the crisis. A unique banking tandem also guarantees a greater choice of available services for the customer, and thus more competition and increased innovation in the fight for each costumer. 

What is more, smaller fintechs also face considerable problems. According to the latest CB Insights report, the value of contracts signed by fintech in Q1 2020 decreased by as much as 35% compared to Q4 2019. Better-invested and profitable fintechs are in a much better position, especially in the context of depletion of investment funds and hence increased competition in the fight for any funds for further development. The problems of some may paradoxically become a pain for others, thus worsening the situation of the sector and, consequently, often of the entire economy. 

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Blockchain for Creators: Secure and Sustainable Infrastructure

Miłosz Mach

07 Nov 2025
Blockchain for Creators: Secure and Sustainable Infrastructure

In today’s digital creative space, where the lines between art and technology are constantly blurring, projects like MARMALADE mark the beginning of a new era - one where creators can protect their work and maintain ownership through blockchain technology.

For Nextrope, being part of MARMALADE goes far beyond implementing features like screenshot blocking or digital watermarking. It’s about building trust infrastructure - systems that empower creators to thrive in the digital world safely and sustainably.

A new kind of blockchain challenge

Cultural and educational projects come with a completely different set of challenges than typical DeFi systems. Here, the focus isn’t on returns or complex smart contracts - it’s on people: artists, illustrators, educators.

That’s why our biggest task was to design secure yet intuitive infrastructure - lightweight, energy-efficient, and accessible for non-technical users exploring Web3 for the first time.

“Our mission wasn’t to build another financial protocol. It was to create a layer of trust for digital creators.”
— Nextrope Team

Security that stays invisible

The best security is the kind you don’t notice.
Within MARMALADE, we focused on making creators' protection seamless:

  • Screenshot blocking safeguards artworks viewed in browsers.
  • Dynamic watermarking helps identify unauthorized copies.
  • Blockchain registry ensures every proof of ownership remains transparent and immutable

“Creators shouldn’t have to think about encryption or private keys - our job is to make security invisible.”

Sustainability by design

MARMALADE also answers a bigger question - how to innovate responsibly.
Nextrope’s infrastructure relies on low-emission blockchain networks and modular architecture that can easily be adapted for other creative or cultural initiatives.

This means the technology built here can support not only artists but also institutions, universities, and educators seeking to integrate blockchain in meaningful ways.

Beyond technology

For Nextrope, MARMALADE is more than a project — it’s proof that blockchain can empower culture and creators, not just finance. By building tools for digital artists, we’re helping them protect their creativity and discover how technology can amplify human expression.

Plasma blockchain. Architecture, Key Features & Why It Matters

Miłosz Mach

21 Oct 2025
Plasma blockchain. Architecture, Key Features & Why It Matters

What is Plasma?

Plasma is a Layer-1 blockchain built specifically for stablecoin infrastructure combining Bitcoin-level security with EVM compatibility and ultra-low fees for stablecoin transfers.

Why Plasma Blockchain Was Created?

Existing blockchains (Ethereum, L2s, etc.) weren’t originally designed around stablecoin payments at scale. As stablecoins grow, issues like congestion, gas cost, latency, and interoperability become constraints. Plasma addresses these by being purpose-built for stablecoin transfers, offering features not found elsewhere.

  • Zero-fee transfers (especially for USDT)
  • Custom gas tokens (separate from XPL, to reduce friction)
  • Trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge (to allow BTC collateral use)
  • Full EVM compatibility smart contracts can work with minimal modifications

Plasma’s Architecture & Core Mechanisms

EVM Compatibility + Smart Contracts

Developers familiar with Ethereum tooling (Solidity, Hardhat, etc.) can deploy contracts on Plasma with limited changes making it easy to port existing dApps or DeFi, similar to other EVM-compatible infrastructures discussed in the article „The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs".

Gas Model & Token Mechanism

Instead of forcing users always to hold XPL for gas, Plasma supports custom gas tokens. For stablecoin-native flows (e.g. USDT transfers), there is often zero fee usage, lowering UX friction.

Bitcoin Bridge & Collateral

Plasma supports a Bitcoin bridge that lets BTC become collateral inside smart contracts (like pBTC). This bridges the security of Bitcoin with DeFi use cases within Plasma.
This makes Plasma a “Bitcoin-secured blockchain for stablecoins".

Security & Finality

Plasma emphasizes finality and security, tuned to payment workloads. Its consensus and architecture aim for strong protection against reorgs and double spends while maintaining high throughput.
The network launched mainnet beta holding over $2B in stablecoin liquidity shortly after opening.

Plasma Blockchain vs Alternatives: What Makes It Stand Out?

FeaturePlasma (XPL)Other L1 / L2
Stablecoin native designusually second-class
Zero fees for stablecoin transfersrare, or subsidized
BTC bridge (collateral)only some chains
EVM compatibilityyes in many, but with trade-offs
High liquidity early✅ (>$2B TVL)many chains struggle to bootstrap

These distinctions make Plasma especially compelling for institutions, stablecoin issuers, and DeFi innovators looking for scalable, low-cost, secure payments infrastructure.

Use Cases: What You Can Build with Plasma Blockchain

  • Stablecoin native vaults / money markets
  • Payment rails & cross-border settlement
  • Treasury and cash management flows
  • Bridged BTC-backed stablecoin services
  • DeFi primitives (DEX, staking, yield aggregation) optimized for stablecoins

If you’re building any product reliant on stablecoin transfers or needing strong collateral backing from BTC, Plasma offers a compelling infrastructure foundation.

Get Started with Plasma Blockchain: Key Steps & Considerations

  1. Smart contract migration: assess if existing contracts can port with minimal changes.
  2. Gas token planning: decide whether to use USDT, separate gas tokens, or hybrid models.
  3. Security & audit: focus on bridge logic, reentrancy, oracle risks.
  4. Liquidity onboarding & market making: bootstrap stablecoin liquidity, incentives.
  5. Regulation & compliance: stablecoin issuance may attract legal scrutiny.
  6. Deploy MVP & scale: iterate fast, measure gas, slippage, UX, security.