Crypto Regulations are coming…

a.shah

19 Oct 2020
Crypto Regulations are coming…

Understanding crypto regulation is an integral step in learning about the blockchain industry. On our Nextrope blog, we decode the existing ecosystem of regulation, recent regulatory changes and barriers against new regulation.

The Status-Quo of Crypto Regulation

Cryptocurrency’s decentralized nature has prevented governments from exercising universal control and regulations. This barrier prompted varying approaches to crypto regulation across countries.

Source: Visual Capitalist

1) Extremely Tight Regulation

Countries such as Algeria, Bolivia, Morocco, Nepal, Pakistan, and Vietnam have completely prohibited cryptocurrency. 

2) Tight Regulation

Qatar and Bahrain permit cryptocurrency-related activities strictly outside the borders. 

3) Slightly Tight Regulation

Instead of directly outlawing crypto-related activities, Bangladesh, Iran, Thailand, Lithuania, Lesotho, China, and Colombia have barred their financial institutions from executing crypto-related transactions.

4) Medium Regulation 

Australia, Canada, and the Isle of Man have amended their counterterrorism and money laundering laws to regulate cryptocurrency markets and mandate  due diligence requirements on their financial institutions.

5) Slightly Weak Regulation

Spain, Belarus, the Cayman Islands, and Luxembourg are establishing crypto-friendly regulations with the goal of attracting tech investments. 

6) Weak Regulation

Belgium, South Africa, and the United Kingdom have determined the current cryptocurrency market to be inconsequentially small and are yet to establish any regulations. 

7) Extremely Weak Regulation

France, Marshall Islands, Venezuela, the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB) member states and Lithuania are in efforts of establishing their own cryptocurrency systems. 

Why is Regulation Necessary?

Wei Zhou, the chief financial officer of the cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, spoke out in support of the cryptoregulation. Experts such as Zhou recognize that the human elements of cryptocurrency makes the system vulnerable to fraud, money laundering, terrorism and organized crime. 

Despite some users’ concerns regarding the potential negative effects of crypto regulations on its trading values and innovation, major crypto regulations have empirically never posed a long-term impact on the share price of Bitcoin, save for some immediate volatility. Further, crypto users widely believe that regulations provide the much needed investor protections that offsets its potential drawbacks. 

Source: Finance Magnates

Recent Regulatory Actions 

European Union (EU) – Proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa)

On September 24, 2020, the EU Commission enacted the regulations on Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa). MiCa’s goals are (1) reducing the rate of cash payment, which currently make up 78% of all payments in the eurozone, and (2) stimulating responsible innovation and competition among financial services providers in the EU. 

MiCA plans to differentiate between crypto-assets governed by EU legislation from crypto-assets that fall outside its scope. Prof. Rasa Karpandza, a professor of Economics and Finance at New York University Abu Dhabi and EBS Business School, claimed that “In order to achieve widespread usage as an alternative to fiat options, blockchain and crypto assets need to be classified appropriately and this is a good first step”.

In order to harmonize the EU market and prevent market regulatory fragmentation, the EU Commission published a single set of immediately applicable rules for the EU's Single Market as opposed to a "Directive", which leaves Member State discretion through the need of national transposition. I believe that MiCA will effectively bring together the fragmented national crypto-asset legal regimes within the EU.

United States (US) – Stablecoin guidance

On September 21, 2020,the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published stablecoin guidance, laying out the legal implications of  cryptocurrencies backed by fiat currencies for the first time. Stablecoin (cryptocurrencies designed to minimize volatility of price and usually backed by fiat money) issuers have been using U.S. banks for years but in an unclear regulatory environment. Through the new guidance, the SEC plans to better ensure safety for the federally regulated banks as they provide services to stablecoin issuers.

Venezuela – Decentralized Exchange

On October 2,2020, the National Superintendency of Securities of Venezuela (Sunaval) authorized the operation of a decentralized electronic exchange. This legalized the exchange of shares, fiat money, securities, debt securities and cryptocurrencies. Sunaval plans to decrease the commissions to nearly 0% in order to encourage its use.

Israel – Treatment of cryptocurrency as Fiat

On September 22, 2020, the Israeli legislature proposed the amendment of existing tax law. While the current income tax policy taxes digital currencies 25% anytime it is converted into fiat, the new legislation seeks to (1) have digital currencies be treated like fiat for tax purposes and (2) exempt gain taxes on digital currencies.

Malaysia – Approval of Cryptocurrency exchange

On January 15, 2019, Malaysia passed “The Capital Markets and Services (Prescription of Securities) (Digital Currency and Digital Token) Order 2019”. Designed to regulate DAX operators, the Order was followed by the legalization of a cryptocurrency exchange agency’s operation. 

Nigeria – Beginning of regulatory conversation

Source: Google Trends, Regions with highest bitcoin searches

Bitcoin has become increasingly popular in Nigeria (highest google searches in the World) and the Nigerian SEC is working to recognize cryptocurrencies as financial securities and establishing safety regulations. The Nigerian SEC claimed that “the general objective of regulation is not to hinder technology or stifle innovation, but to create standards that encourage ethical practices”,  advocating that this will protect investors’ interests and promote transparency. 

South Korea – Permit System for Crypto Exchanges

On March 5, 2020, South Korea’s National Assembly passed a revised bill on the reporting and the use of special financial transaction information. The bill introduces a permit system for cryptocurrency exchanges as well as the plans to strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) system for virtual assets including cryptocurrency.

China – Digital Yuan

China has been working vigorously on the digital yuan, though cryptocurrency is formally banned in the country. Digital yuan targets the dominance of tech giants, such as Alibaba and Tencent, in the digital payments sector. However, the government remains cautious in its approach to both its own cryptocurrency and digital assets and is yet to issue regulations.

Barriers against Regulations?

1) Economic Strategy

Because some governments believe that crypto regulation will impede growth and innovation, they intentionally avoid implementing regulations as an economic strategy. These governments also believe that while high barriers to entry through stricter regulation can benefit users by providing security, it may also curtail potential projects through financial and regulatory strains.

2) Incomplete Understanding of Cryptomarket

Current understanding of cryptocurrency, of users, economists and policymakers, remains incomplete, partly due to the volatility of the crypto market and its small size. Thus, governments are hesitant to implement hasty regulations.

3) Threat to National Economic Sovereignty

Countries, specifically the developing nations, believe that cryptocurrency will be harmful to their economic sovereignty. Decentralized finance has the potential to disrupt the financial services sector. 

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Blockchain for Creators: Secure and Sustainable Infrastructure

Miłosz Mach

07 Nov 2025
Blockchain for Creators: Secure and Sustainable Infrastructure

In today’s digital creative space, where the lines between art and technology are constantly blurring, projects like MARMALADE mark the beginning of a new era - one where creators can protect their work and maintain ownership through blockchain technology.

For Nextrope, being part of MARMALADE goes far beyond implementing features like screenshot blocking or digital watermarking. It’s about building trust infrastructure - systems that empower creators to thrive in the digital world safely and sustainably.

A new kind of blockchain challenge

Cultural and educational projects come with a completely different set of challenges than typical DeFi systems. Here, the focus isn’t on returns or complex smart contracts - it’s on people: artists, illustrators, educators.

That’s why our biggest task was to design secure yet intuitive infrastructure - lightweight, energy-efficient, and accessible for non-technical users exploring Web3 for the first time.

“Our mission wasn’t to build another financial protocol. It was to create a layer of trust for digital creators.”
— Nextrope Team

Security that stays invisible

The best security is the kind you don’t notice.
Within MARMALADE, we focused on making creators' protection seamless:

  • Screenshot blocking safeguards artworks viewed in browsers.
  • Dynamic watermarking helps identify unauthorized copies.
  • Blockchain registry ensures every proof of ownership remains transparent and immutable

“Creators shouldn’t have to think about encryption or private keys - our job is to make security invisible.”

Sustainability by design

MARMALADE also answers a bigger question - how to innovate responsibly.
Nextrope’s infrastructure relies on low-emission blockchain networks and modular architecture that can easily be adapted for other creative or cultural initiatives.

This means the technology built here can support not only artists but also institutions, universities, and educators seeking to integrate blockchain in meaningful ways.

Beyond technology

For Nextrope, MARMALADE is more than a project — it’s proof that blockchain can empower culture and creators, not just finance. By building tools for digital artists, we’re helping them protect their creativity and discover how technology can amplify human expression.

Plasma blockchain. Architecture, Key Features & Why It Matters

Miłosz Mach

21 Oct 2025
Plasma blockchain. Architecture, Key Features & Why It Matters

What is Plasma?

Plasma is a Layer-1 blockchain built specifically for stablecoin infrastructure combining Bitcoin-level security with EVM compatibility and ultra-low fees for stablecoin transfers.

Why Plasma Blockchain Was Created?

Existing blockchains (Ethereum, L2s, etc.) weren’t originally designed around stablecoin payments at scale. As stablecoins grow, issues like congestion, gas cost, latency, and interoperability become constraints. Plasma addresses these by being purpose-built for stablecoin transfers, offering features not found elsewhere.

  • Zero-fee transfers (especially for USDT)
  • Custom gas tokens (separate from XPL, to reduce friction)
  • Trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge (to allow BTC collateral use)
  • Full EVM compatibility smart contracts can work with minimal modifications

Plasma’s Architecture & Core Mechanisms

EVM Compatibility + Smart Contracts

Developers familiar with Ethereum tooling (Solidity, Hardhat, etc.) can deploy contracts on Plasma with limited changes making it easy to port existing dApps or DeFi, similar to other EVM-compatible infrastructures discussed in the article „The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs".

Gas Model & Token Mechanism

Instead of forcing users always to hold XPL for gas, Plasma supports custom gas tokens. For stablecoin-native flows (e.g. USDT transfers), there is often zero fee usage, lowering UX friction.

Bitcoin Bridge & Collateral

Plasma supports a Bitcoin bridge that lets BTC become collateral inside smart contracts (like pBTC). This bridges the security of Bitcoin with DeFi use cases within Plasma.
This makes Plasma a “Bitcoin-secured blockchain for stablecoins".

Security & Finality

Plasma emphasizes finality and security, tuned to payment workloads. Its consensus and architecture aim for strong protection against reorgs and double spends while maintaining high throughput.
The network launched mainnet beta holding over $2B in stablecoin liquidity shortly after opening.

Plasma Blockchain vs Alternatives: What Makes It Stand Out?

FeaturePlasma (XPL)Other L1 / L2
Stablecoin native designusually second-class
Zero fees for stablecoin transfersrare, or subsidized
BTC bridge (collateral)only some chains
EVM compatibilityyes in many, but with trade-offs
High liquidity early✅ (>$2B TVL)many chains struggle to bootstrap

These distinctions make Plasma especially compelling for institutions, stablecoin issuers, and DeFi innovators looking for scalable, low-cost, secure payments infrastructure.

Use Cases: What You Can Build with Plasma Blockchain

  • Stablecoin native vaults / money markets
  • Payment rails & cross-border settlement
  • Treasury and cash management flows
  • Bridged BTC-backed stablecoin services
  • DeFi primitives (DEX, staking, yield aggregation) optimized for stablecoins

If you’re building any product reliant on stablecoin transfers or needing strong collateral backing from BTC, Plasma offers a compelling infrastructure foundation.

Get Started with Plasma Blockchain: Key Steps & Considerations

  1. Smart contract migration: assess if existing contracts can port with minimal changes.
  2. Gas token planning: decide whether to use USDT, separate gas tokens, or hybrid models.
  3. Security & audit: focus on bridge logic, reentrancy, oracle risks.
  4. Liquidity onboarding & market making: bootstrap stablecoin liquidity, incentives.
  5. Regulation & compliance: stablecoin issuance may attract legal scrutiny.
  6. Deploy MVP & scale: iterate fast, measure gas, slippage, UX, security.