Can AI Make Software Unhackable?

Paulina Lewandowska

28 Feb 2023
Can AI Make Software Unhackable?

Introduction

The difficulty in ensuring software security and the frequency of hacking incidents underline the need for workable solutions. There is a rising need for creative ways to deal with these issues as cyber attacks become more sophisticated and prevalent. Software security can potentially be improved with the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI is a valuable tool for strengthening software security because it can analyze data, spot patterns, and identify potential dangers in real-time. To properly incorporate any new technology into a complete security strategy, it's crucial to grasp both its strengths and limitations. This essay will examine how AI might enhance software security, its drawbacks, and the need of a comprehensive strategy for software security.

How AI Can Improve Software Security

AI can significantly improve software security by quickly identifying and thwarting assaults. Predictive modeling and other AI-based techniques for anomaly or intrusion detection are used to achieve this. Analyzing system behavior and spotting odd patterns that can point to an attack is known as anomaly detection. Machine learning methods are used in intrusion detection to find well-known attack patterns and stop them from doing damage. On the other side, predictive modeling makes use of previous data to anticipate potential hazards and actively counteract them.IBM and Microsoft are two well-known businesses that have effectively applied AI to enhance their software security. IBM uses threat detection and response systems that are AI-based, and Microsoft uses AI-based predictive modeling to find vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. These illustrations show how AI has the ability to improve software security and defend against online threats.

Limitations of AI in Making Software Unhackable

Despite the possibility that AI could enhance software security, it's critical to recognize its limitations. AI cannot ensure total security and cannot provide a complete solution to making software unhackable. With AI-based systems, false positives and negatives are a common problem that can cause normal operations to be classified as malicious or the opposite. However, human control and involvement are still necessary for AI systems to operate accurately and effectively. However, it's possible that AI-based systems could be breached or manipulated, creating security holes in software. As a result, even though AI has a significant impact on software security, this impact should be viewed in the context of a bigger, more comprehensive security strategy that takes into account a variety of aspects, including personnel training, program design, and routine upgrades.

Threats to Consider with AI-Based Software

AI-based software is not impervious to dangers and weaknesses, as is the case with all technologies. It's important to note that AI can be influenced or hacked. AI system flaws can be used by attackers to get around security and access private information. AI-based systems may also generate false positives or false negatives, resulting in security holes or pointless alerts. AI systems may also be biased, which occurs when the system generates unfair or discriminatory conclusions as a result of the data it was trained on. It's crucial to put appropriate security measures in place and often upgrade AI systems to fix any known flaws in order to counteract these dangers. The possibility of bias can also be reduced by making sure AI decision-making is transparent and equitable. Companies may guarantee the ongoing security of their systems and data by identifying and resolving the potential vulnerabilities posed by AI-based software.

The Importance of a Holistic Approach to Software Security

A holistic strategy that incorporates AI as one of several components is necessary to provide complete software security. Several aspects, such as employee training, program design, and routine upgrades, all have an impact on the security of software. These aspects should all be addressed in a comprehensive security policy. This entails training staff members about security best practices, such as password management and phishing awareness, as well as developing software with security in mind to obviate vulnerabilities and updating it frequently to fix known flaws. Companies can reduce their vulnerability to cyberattacks and guard against the compromise of critical data by adopting a comprehensive strategy. For instance, Google has a thorough security policy that includes multi-factor authentication, employee training, and routine software updates, which has assisted the business in preventing numerous high-profile attacks. Companies can keep ahead of changing cyberthreats and defend their data and systems from potential attacks by integrating AI with a thorough security strategy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while AI has the potential to improve software security, it's critical to understand that it isn't a panacea. Software security requires a complete security strategy with a number of elements, including personnel training, program design, routine upgrades, and AI-based solutions. Companies can reduce their vulnerability to cyberattacks and guard against the compromise of critical data by adopting a comprehensive strategy. AI-based systems can identify and stop threats in real time, but they are not infallible and still need human supervision and intervention. Hence, rather than being considered a stand-alone solution, AI should be seen as a part of a bigger security strategy. Companies may improve their software security and keep up with new cyber threats by taking a comprehensive approach.

Do you want to get to know how to make the most of AI and GPT-like models? Check our last article here!

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Blockchain for Creators: Secure and Sustainable Infrastructure

Miłosz Mach

07 Nov 2025
Blockchain for Creators: Secure and Sustainable Infrastructure

In today’s digital creative space, where the lines between art and technology are constantly blurring, projects like MARMALADE mark the beginning of a new era - one where creators can protect their work and maintain ownership through blockchain technology.

For Nextrope, being part of MARMALADE goes far beyond implementing features like screenshot blocking or digital watermarking. It’s about building trust infrastructure - systems that empower creators to thrive in the digital world safely and sustainably.

A new kind of blockchain challenge

Cultural and educational projects come with a completely different set of challenges than typical DeFi systems. Here, the focus isn’t on returns or complex smart contracts - it’s on people: artists, illustrators, educators.

That’s why our biggest task was to design secure yet intuitive infrastructure - lightweight, energy-efficient, and accessible for non-technical users exploring Web3 for the first time.

“Our mission wasn’t to build another financial protocol. It was to create a layer of trust for digital creators.”
— Nextrope Team

Security that stays invisible

The best security is the kind you don’t notice.
Within MARMALADE, we focused on making creators' protection seamless:

  • Screenshot blocking safeguards artworks viewed in browsers.
  • Dynamic watermarking helps identify unauthorized copies.
  • Blockchain registry ensures every proof of ownership remains transparent and immutable

“Creators shouldn’t have to think about encryption or private keys - our job is to make security invisible.”

Sustainability by design

MARMALADE also answers a bigger question - how to innovate responsibly.
Nextrope’s infrastructure relies on low-emission blockchain networks and modular architecture that can easily be adapted for other creative or cultural initiatives.

This means the technology built here can support not only artists but also institutions, universities, and educators seeking to integrate blockchain in meaningful ways.

Beyond technology

For Nextrope, MARMALADE is more than a project — it’s proof that blockchain can empower culture and creators, not just finance. By building tools for digital artists, we’re helping them protect their creativity and discover how technology can amplify human expression.

Plasma blockchain. Architecture, Key Features & Why It Matters

Miłosz Mach

21 Oct 2025
Plasma blockchain. Architecture, Key Features & Why It Matters

What is Plasma?

Plasma is a Layer-1 blockchain built specifically for stablecoin infrastructure combining Bitcoin-level security with EVM compatibility and ultra-low fees for stablecoin transfers.

Why Plasma Blockchain Was Created?

Existing blockchains (Ethereum, L2s, etc.) weren’t originally designed around stablecoin payments at scale. As stablecoins grow, issues like congestion, gas cost, latency, and interoperability become constraints. Plasma addresses these by being purpose-built for stablecoin transfers, offering features not found elsewhere.

  • Zero-fee transfers (especially for USDT)
  • Custom gas tokens (separate from XPL, to reduce friction)
  • Trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge (to allow BTC collateral use)
  • Full EVM compatibility smart contracts can work with minimal modifications

Plasma’s Architecture & Core Mechanisms

EVM Compatibility + Smart Contracts

Developers familiar with Ethereum tooling (Solidity, Hardhat, etc.) can deploy contracts on Plasma with limited changes making it easy to port existing dApps or DeFi, similar to other EVM-compatible infrastructures discussed in the article „The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs".

Gas Model & Token Mechanism

Instead of forcing users always to hold XPL for gas, Plasma supports custom gas tokens. For stablecoin-native flows (e.g. USDT transfers), there is often zero fee usage, lowering UX friction.

Bitcoin Bridge & Collateral

Plasma supports a Bitcoin bridge that lets BTC become collateral inside smart contracts (like pBTC). This bridges the security of Bitcoin with DeFi use cases within Plasma.
This makes Plasma a “Bitcoin-secured blockchain for stablecoins".

Security & Finality

Plasma emphasizes finality and security, tuned to payment workloads. Its consensus and architecture aim for strong protection against reorgs and double spends while maintaining high throughput.
The network launched mainnet beta holding over $2B in stablecoin liquidity shortly after opening.

Plasma Blockchain vs Alternatives: What Makes It Stand Out?

FeaturePlasma (XPL)Other L1 / L2
Stablecoin native designusually second-class
Zero fees for stablecoin transfersrare, or subsidized
BTC bridge (collateral)only some chains
EVM compatibilityyes in many, but with trade-offs
High liquidity early✅ (>$2B TVL)many chains struggle to bootstrap

These distinctions make Plasma especially compelling for institutions, stablecoin issuers, and DeFi innovators looking for scalable, low-cost, secure payments infrastructure.

Use Cases: What You Can Build with Plasma Blockchain

  • Stablecoin native vaults / money markets
  • Payment rails & cross-border settlement
  • Treasury and cash management flows
  • Bridged BTC-backed stablecoin services
  • DeFi primitives (DEX, staking, yield aggregation) optimized for stablecoins

If you’re building any product reliant on stablecoin transfers or needing strong collateral backing from BTC, Plasma offers a compelling infrastructure foundation.

Get Started with Plasma Blockchain: Key Steps & Considerations

  1. Smart contract migration: assess if existing contracts can port with minimal changes.
  2. Gas token planning: decide whether to use USDT, separate gas tokens, or hybrid models.
  3. Security & audit: focus on bridge logic, reentrancy, oracle risks.
  4. Liquidity onboarding & market making: bootstrap stablecoin liquidity, incentives.
  5. Regulation & compliance: stablecoin issuance may attract legal scrutiny.
  6. Deploy MVP & scale: iterate fast, measure gas, slippage, UX, security.